North Yorkshire councillors ‘should consider horse riders’ when planning new active travel schemes

A string of Mark Johnston horses in Middlham. Photo: Ian Preston.

Members of the equestrian community have urged local authority bosses overseeing the development government-funded active travel schemes to consider the needs of horse riders.

A meeting of North Yorkshire’s Local Access Forum heard members raise concerns over North Yorkshire County Council’s plans to focus on improvements targeted at cyclists and pedestrians in urban areas.

Council officers told the meeting local cycling and walking infrastructure plans had been designed by the government to focus on increasing those specific activities, reducing road casualties and increase the number of young children walking to school, rather than active travel generally.

They said the plans mainly considered equestrians where they have access to, or near routes where the council was proposing to deliver a scheme.

Officers said it was recognised that horse riding had the same health and wellbeing benefits as cycling and walking, but the infrastructure blueprints had to meet government criteria to receive funding for cycling and walking.

The meeting heard the government guidelines described as “prescriptive” and that the council would consider equestrians mainly on out of town routes which focused on leisure.

The council’s policy to focus active travel improvements on urban areas where schemes impact on the most people has repeatedly been criticised by rural residents who say it leaves them with no option but to travel by motorised transport.

Forum member, horse rider and carriage driver Will Scarlett questioned how the authority had decided many urban routes would be unsuitable for equestrians, saying they were often left with no option but to ride on roads.

Another member, Janet Cochrane, said she was concerned equestrians were being ignored by the council. She said while many equestrians were older people, by not providing for them there was “an element of discrimination” in the authority’s strategy.

She said: “I understand that you have to abide by national guidelines, but North Yorkshire is a predominantly rural county and there is a very high number of horses owned and used for leisure purposes. There has to be a way of incorporating them into the rights of way network.

“Although it is assumed that horses are mainly used for leisure purposes, in fact people do use them to go and visit their friends, they even use them for shopping, they use them to vote at polling stations.”

Caroline Bradley, of the British Horse Society told the meeting the creation of new paths to increase active travel was to be welcomed provided that equestrians were included, as a minimum, to routes outside of large town centres.

She called on the council, which is set to learn in November whether its £1.6m of bids for walking and cycling schemes will receive government funding, to give consideration when developing cycling and walking plans for areas to create a network of maximum benefit for all non-motorised users.

Ms Bradley said: “Many of the proposed routes will be in urban areas. However, many horses are kept on the urban fringe, so it is important that equestrians are not excluded from routes that exit the urban areas into the surrounding environment.

“Active travel and local walking and cycling initiatives should not in any way compromise the use of public rights of way by making them less amenable to existing lawful users.”

The meeting heard the “roadification” of rural bridleways led to “heads down speed cycling and danger for other users” and a warning that the Highways Act 1980 road stated grass verges must be kept available for horses.

Mrs Bradley also called for crossing points, bridges and underpasses to be made suitable for all user groups, as well as the creation of quiet lanes, where the speed of traffic is reduced.

She said: “If equestrians are not included user ion active travel routes, the consequence is equestrians are left on the carriageway with lorries and cars passing them on the outside and cyclists passing them on the inside, which is an accident waiting to happen.”


  1. As a rural or very rural area we need traffic free routes between our population centres that allow walkers, cyclists (and horse riders) to travel safely in a traffic free environment. Road routes are rarely suitable for walking (fast traffic, no pavements) and can be too busy for many to feel safe cycling or horse riding. We need a network of traffic free routes that safely and efficiently link our towns and villages, eg. Northallerton, Bedale, Scorton, Catterick, Richmond and Reeth. Local government needs to use it’s powers to create an effective network fit for a low carbon future.

  2. Well in Middleham there are over 100 race horses passing trough the town every morning on there way to and from the moor training ground.
    When they pass through the town they encounter many cars, tractors, large Lorries and people walking etc which do not mix very well with frisky race horses, so it would be nice if some of the Government money could be spent on a bypass route round the town for the race horses and make Middleham a safer place for everyone.

Comments are closed.