Proposed Yorkshire Dale plan ‘would fail to protect communities’

Hawes. Photo: Nilfanion/Wikimedia.

A proposed blueprint to help reverse the exodus of young people from the Yorkshire Dales has been criticised for failing to address the erosion of communities and creating homes for commuters to cities such as Leeds and Bradford.

Members of the Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority have called for proposals to focus housing development in the protected area’s larger settlements, and mainly near its southern boundary, to be reconsidered ahead of its Local Plan development blueprint progressing later this year.

Most of the proposed development land is in the park’s largest settlements, with up to 50 homes in Hawes, 92 homes in Sedbergh, 199 homes in Grassington and neighbouring Threshfield and 119 more homes nine miles away in Embsay, but sites have also been identified in other villages.

Under the proposed plans additional housing will also be able to be built on smaller plots of land in housing development boundaries.

The proposed strategy follows the North Yorkshire Rural Commission concluding that to make remote communities sustainable each parish in rural North Yorkshire should see five houses built over a ten-year period, 40 per cent of which needed to be affordable or available for rent.

A full meeting of the authority at its base in Wensleydale was told that while North Yorkshire and Westmorland and Furness councils had indicated broad support for the blueprint, hundreds of residents were opposed to it.

Members were told following a survey of 139 sites put forward by landowners and planning officers for housing in the national park, only 33 of them, sufficient for 600 houses, had potential for allocation in the Local Plan.

Peter Stockton, the authority’s head of sustainable development, told members its consultation over proposed sites to meet a housing target of 850 new homes by 2040, had seen residents object to the vast majority of 33 proposed sites.

He said: “Allocating land and then developing land for housing is quite a big change and has an effect on people’s lives.”

Residents told the consultation the potential site allocations were skewed to the former Craven area and the blueprint did not focus housing on areas needing it most.

As the authority’s members agreed a working group to reconsider the proposals, no one spoke in support of the current blueprint.

Skipton councillor Robert Heseltine said the glue holding together village communities together across the national park was their facilities, and in particular schools, and their catchment areas needed to be strengthened by housing that would be occupied by young families, who also worked nearby.

He said: “That’s the only sustainable way of keeping those smaller communities together.”

Numerous members of the authority voiced their agreement as Graham Simpkins, who represents the northern area of the park, said the proposed housing would be used by people who worked in Leeds and Bradford and did not seem to meet the objectives of having viable communities within the Yorkshire Dales.

He warned: “Building large blocks on the southern edge… basically all we are doing providing commuter accommodation.

“I appreciate the difficulty, but we need to identify smaller sites in and around the Dales to support the communities.”

Wensleydale farmer Allen Kirkbride told the meeting more housing was sorely needed in the northern area of the park.

He said: “A lot of this development is in the south of the park and we’ve got to be very careful we don’t look as though it’s urbanisation of certain parts of the south.”

Upper Dales councillor Yvonne Peacock added: “Officers have put huge amounts of work into this, but now there is more work to do.”

1 Comment

  1. If more houses are to be constructed in the Dales there would be less objection if they were in keeping with existing traditional Dales houses i.e. using local stone and stone roof tiles where possible, mullion windows where possible. As opposed to uniform council type hoses with pebbledashed walls, and component windows and doors. They don’t belong and present an eyesore for tourists.
    Dudley Edwards,
    Retired University Lecturer on Aesthetics.

Comments are closed.